By Jonathan Mbiriyamveka
Delta Corporation is on track to become Zimbabwe’s third billion-dollar company, but a mounting tax burden and a US$97 million dispute with revenue authorities threaten to undermine the beverages giant’s historic run.
The company’s first-quarter trading update, covering the period ended 30 June 2026, reveals that while volumes and revenue are surging, fiscal pressures are intensifying—raising questions about policy consistency and the investment climate in Zimbabwe.
The Sugar Tax ‘Noose’
Delta paid an equivalent of US$7.3 million in sugar tax during the quarter across its affected non-alcoholic beverage categories. This comes on top of US$20.3 million paid in the prior financial year-to-date.
Management has described the sugar tax as a “noose” around sparkling beverages.
The tax continues to pressure locally manufactured soft drinks, placing them at a price disadvantage against formal and informal imported alternatives from regional markets that do not carry an equivalent fiscal burden.
“Notwithstanding this improvement, the sugar tax burden remains disproportionately high relative to earnings performance,” Delta stated in a previous update.
The non-alcoholic beverages portfolio—comprising Sparkling Beverages, Maheu and Schweppes’ cordials, juices and bottled water businesses—delivered combined volume growth of 14% for the quarter.
However, the category continues to lose share to cheaper imports and products using artificial sweeteners, widening the affordability gap.
The Group continues to engage authorities on a review of the sugar tax regime.
The US$97 Million Tax Dispute
A larger cloud hangs over the company in the form of a US$97 million assessment from the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA), tied to currency-based tax obligations dating back to the country’s 2019-2022 monetary upheaval.
The dispute centres on “technical questions of methodology, currency of settlement, allocation and attribution as well as the risk of retrospective interpretation being applied to transactions undertaken under a different monetary framework,” according to Delta group treasurer Tumai Mafunga .
Delta maintains that obligations were settled in the lawful currency applicable at the time. The company has already paid US$14.6 million under the “pay now, argue later” principle, with matters still pending in court.
The case is being closely watched by investors and corporate executives, many of whom see it as a critical test of whether Zimbabwe can provide predictable, transparent and consistently applied rules for formal sector businesses.
Investor Confidence at Stake
Mafunga warned that the implications extend beyond Delta: “The broader implication is that tax certainty matters as much as macro-economic stability.
Investors can absorb tax cost. What undermines capital allocation is uncertainty over how rules will be interpreted, whether they will be applied consistently and whether positions taken in good faith under the legal framework of the day can later be revisited on a different basis.”
Delta’s effective tax rate has risen sharply to 27.6% from 16.6%, fuelling broader concerns among investors and business leaders that policy inconsistency and retrospective regulatory action are increasing the risks and costs of operating in Zimbabwe.
Analysts warn that retrospective tax claims linked to periods of policy ambiguity risk reinforcing perceptions that regulatory exposure in Zimbabwe can remain open-ended long after transactions have been concluded.
A Billion-Dollar Run Under Threat?
Delta is projected to exceed US$1 billion in annual revenue for the current financial year, a feat that would make it the third Zimbabwean firm to breach this threshold, trailing only Innscor Africa Limited and Zimplats Holdings .
The company’s first-quarter performance suggests this trajectory remains intact, with revenue growing 23% to US$294.6 million.
However, increased taxes threaten renewed investor interest in its stocks and earning potential.
“These assessments have a material impact on the group’s operations, if upheld in their current form,” Delta stated. “Ambiguities in the tax legislation remain pervasive, increasing the risk of further interpretation disputes under the existing tax framework.”
While authorities have intensified efforts to widen tax collection and stabilise public finances, business leaders argue that inconsistencies between fiscal, monetary and regulatory policy continue to complicate long-term planning and discourage investment.
For Delta—and for Zimbabwe’s broader investment climate—the resolution of these fiscal pressures may prove as important as the macroeconomic stability that has fuelled the company’s remarkable growth.
About Author
