By Admore Mbonda in Kariba
Residents associations in Mashonaland West Province have voiced their strong opposition to the government’s recent proposal to privatize municipal water supply systems.
This decision has ignited a heated debate among locals, with divergent views on its potential impact on the ongoing water crisis.
During an interactive media session on January 6, Minister of Local Government and Public Works, Daniel Garwe, introduced a plan aimed at addressing the persistent challenges in municipal water service delivery.
The government aims to privatize water purification, distribution, and billing systems, a move it believes will improve the quality of life for urban dwellers.
However, many residents are skeptical. Samson Coffee, Public Relations Officer for the Kariba Urban Residents Association, expressed his concerns, stating,
“This shows the government itself is failing its mandate. I wonder why we have legislators making it worse. They should look to Zambia for better management practices. Tightening screws doesn’t ease business operations; it complicates them for everyone. We must be realistic about our responsibilities.”
Chinhoyi Residents Trust Chairperson Sibongile Mugjima added, “Privatization could lead to higher water bills. We need solutions that keep water affordable for all residents, not just those who can pay more. The government should support local authorities’ funds.”
The Chegutu Residents Association echoed similar sentiments, urging leaders to invest in public infrastructure.
“The government must prioritize sustainable solutions over quick fixes that could leave vulnerable populations behind,” a representative stated.
Trymore Chinembiri, chairperson of the Karoi Urban Residents Association, emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in water management.
“Our communities deserve better than a privatized water system that may prioritize profit over public need,” he said.
The ongoing discussions reflect a community deeply concerned about the future of their essential resources, and the outcome of this debate will likely shape the region’s water management policies for years to come.
Residents have drawn comparisons with the local public transport system, ZUPCO, which many believe demonstrates the pitfalls of government-run services. One resident remarked, “Look at ZUPCO versus today’s private transport operators. Private buses run every ten minutes, while ZUPCO is hardly seen.
“ They lack the capacity to serve the nation effectively. It’s not that they’re failing; they simply can’t meet demand.”
The proposed privatization has raised alarm bells among community leaders who fear it will not resolve the water crisis but rather exacerbate it. Critics argue that privatization could lead to increased costs for residents and a lack of accountability.
Zimbabwe’s water crisis has plagued urban councils for years, and the government’s latest policy shift has left many questioning whether privatization is the right path forward.
As the debate continues, residents remain vigilant, advocating for solutions that prioritize accessibility and accountability in water management.
About Author
